Which type of interview is most likely to emphasize consistency in applicant evaluation?

A structured interview is most likely to emphasize consistency in applicant evaluation. This is because a structured interview follows a predetermined format and set of questions that are the same for every candidate. This approach provides a standardized method of evaluation, allowing for more objective comparisons between applicants. Since each interviewee answers the same questions in a consistent manner, it helps to minimize subjective interpretations and biases that may arise in other interview formats.

Structured interviews typically include scoring rubrics or evaluation criteria, which further enhance the consistency of candidate assessments. By limiting the variability in how questions are asked and answered, structured interviews contribute to more reliable hiring decisions. This method also aids in ensuring that candidates are evaluated based on the same competencies and qualifications, promoting fairness throughout the hiring process.

Other types of interviews, such as unstructured, behavioral, and situational interviews, can vary significantly in their formats and questions, potentially leading to more subjective and less consistent evaluations of candidates.